Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1282 days newer than Radeon Pro 5300M.
Advantages of Radeon Pro 5300M
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 85 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 153% better in Dishonored 2 than Radeon Pro 5300M - 139 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro 5300M - 16 vs 4 GB
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£484.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £484.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro 5300M | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
1250 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |