Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms GeForce MX450 25W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 2487 days older than GeForce MX450 25W.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 25 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than GeForce MX450 25W - 100 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W - 4 vs 2 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
46%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
29%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $549 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |