Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 265 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1895 days newer than Radeon R7 265.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 57% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R7 265 - 63 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 6 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
1455 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1590 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
