Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 923 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 50 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 129% better in God of War than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 96 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
96
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£262.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £262.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
14%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |