Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 1268 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 64% better in DOOM Eternal than GeForce GTX 1650 - 277 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 52% cheaper than Arc A750 - £139.98 vs £291.76
- Up to 21% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Arc A750 - £0.83 vs £1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 75 vs 225 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for £291.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
169
61%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£139.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £139.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
17%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$289 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |