Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 2089 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Performs up to 5% better in War Thunder than Radeon R9 280 - 227 vs 216 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 100 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
FPS
227
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£262.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £262.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Nov 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$159 | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1725 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |