Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 D6 VENTUS XS OCV3 Gaming Graphics Card - 4GB GDDR6, 1620MHz, PCI Express x16 3.0, 128-bit, 1x DP, HDMI 2.0b

Buy for £139.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 177 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 D6 VENTUS XS OCV3 Gaming Graphics Card - 4GB GDDR6, 1620MHz, PCI Express x16 3.0, 128-bit, 1x DP, HDMI 2.0b

Buy for £139.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 177 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1876 days newer than Radeon R9 280.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 25% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Radeon R9 280 - 35 vs 28 FPS
  • Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 75 vs 200 Watts
  • Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
This is a free version of A Plague Tale: Requiem.
A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 280 Logo
Radeon R9 280

Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014


FPS

28

80%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

35

100%

Value, £/FPS

£4/FPS

100%

Price, £

£139.98

100%

FPS and Value Winner

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 D6 VENTUS XS OCV3 Gaming Graphics Card - 4GB GDDR6, 1620MHz, PCI Express x16 3.0, 128-bit, 1x DP, HDMI 2.0b

Buy for £139.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 177 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 280 Logo
Radeon R9 280

Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R9 280 Logo
Radeon R9 280

Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014


Pixel Fillrate

29.86 GPixel/s

56%

Texel Fillrate

104.5 GTexel/s

100%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

89%

AMD Radeon R9 280 Logo

AMD Radeon R9 280

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Mar 4th, 2014Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
Volcanic IslandsGenerationGeForce 16
$279MSRP
$149
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinPower ConnectorsNone
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
3 GBMemory
4 GB
GDDR5TypeGDDR5
384-bitBus128-bit
240 GB/s
Bandwidth128.1 GB/s
827 MHzBase Clock Speed
1485 MHz
933 MHzBoost Clock Speed
1665 MHz
1250 MHzMemory Clock Speed
2001 MHz

Builds Using Radeon R9 280 or GeForce GTX 1650

A Plague Tale: Requiem, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.