Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 2381 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Radeon R7 260X - 50 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 30 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 4 vs 2 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R7 260X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |
