Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260X outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260X is 1679 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTS 250 - 39 vs 37 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 115 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Radeon R7 260X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 260X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $199 | MSRP | $139 |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |
