Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 Ti outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 1240 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - 45 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Performs up to 13% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 105 vs 93 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
10%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
68%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | GeForce 10 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1291 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1392 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1752 MHz |
