Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 380 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 380 is 745 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 380 - 45 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 380
- Performs up to 250% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 28 vs 8 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
14%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
42%
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
31.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
108.6 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 970 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
