Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 3418 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 45 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 256% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 114 vs 32 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
114
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£245.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £245.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7714 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
1%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
8%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
HD Graphics | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 8 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |