Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 3291 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 440% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Radeon R7 260X - 108 vs 20 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 115 vs 225 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £245.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
6.547619047619048%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
11.458333333333332%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Alchemist | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$289 | MSRP | $139 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |