The GeForce RTX 4090 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only £3464.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 4700% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 99% cheaper – £34.99 vs £3499.00
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 31 vs 450 Watts
GeForce RTX 4090 vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4090
Sep 20th, 2022
Average FPS
223
100%
Min 1% FPS
146
100%
Price, £
£3499
1%
Value, £/FPS
£15.69/FPS
6%
Buy on Amazon
£3,499.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£4,950.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£5,150.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£5,200.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£34.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£169.88
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4090 vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 4090 vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 4090 vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 4090
Sep 20th, 2022
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1010 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
82.58 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
2%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
1%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
0%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
0%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 4090 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 20th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| $1,599.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 40 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 450 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
24 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| GDDR6X | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
1010 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
443.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
1290 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
82.58 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
