The GeForce 210 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only £1530.51 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 98% cheaper – £34.99 vs £1565.50
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 31 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 4700% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 0 GB
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 3090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
£34.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£161.94
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, £
£1565.5
2%
Value, £/FPS
£9.66/FPS
9%
Buy on Amazon
£1,565.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,900.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£2,302.67
In Stock
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
2%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
1%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 350 W |
Memory | ||
0.5 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
2.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
4.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 556 GTexel/s |
39.36 GFLOPS | FP32 | 35.58 TFLOPS |