The GeForce RTX 3070 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's £102.72 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 12% cheaper – £752.41 vs £855.13
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 20% less energy – 220 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The GeForce RTX 3070 is better in every way
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 3070
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
129
100%
Min 1% FPS
76
100%
Price, £
£752.41
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.83/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£752.41
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£669.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£615.29
In Stock
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
52%
Min 1% FPS
33
43%
Price, £
£855.13
87%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
46%
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 3070
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
20.31 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
39%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
50%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
25%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 3070 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 30 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
220 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
165.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
317.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
20.31 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
