The GeForce GTX 950 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 950
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 90 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 950
Aug 20th, 2015
Average FPS
52
63%
Min 1% FPS
23
52%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, £
£618.12
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.44/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£618.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£712.65
In Stock
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 950
Aug 20th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
105.8 GB/s
37%
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
34%
FP32
1.825 TFLOPS
34%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 950 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 20th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$159.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
90 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 105.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 38.02 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 57.02 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 1.825 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
