Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 780 Ti on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 2995 days newer than the more expensive GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 780 Ti - 12 vs 11 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than GeForce GTX 780 Ti - £219.28 vs £799.98
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 780 Ti - £18.27 vs £72.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti - 50 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti - 4 vs 3 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £799.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
12
100%
Value, £/FPS
£18.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£219.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £219.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 7th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 7th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
55.68 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
222.7 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
50%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 7th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$699 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
384-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
336.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
875 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
928 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |