Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 7900 GRE outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro W6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 7900 GRE is 554 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Up to 69% cheaper than Radeon RX 7900 GRE - £217.96 vs £699.99
- Up to 17% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Radeon RX 7900 GRE - £8.07 vs £9.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE - 50 vs 260 Watts
Advantages of Radeon RX 7900 GRE
- Performs up to 167% better in Immortals of Aveum than Radeon Pro W6400 - 72 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 16 vs 4 GB
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
27
38%
Value, £/FPS
£8.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£217.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £217.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2023
FPS
72
100%
Value, £/FPS
£9.72/FPS
83%
Price, £
£699.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
17%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
16%
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
431 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
718.4 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Navi III |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2245 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |