The GeForce 210 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only £297.23 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 89% cheaper – £34.99 vs £332.22
- Consumes up to 85% less energy – 31 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 0 GB
GeForce 210 vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
£34.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£161.94
In Stock
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, £
£332.22
10%
Value, £/FPS
£3.39/FPS
26%
GeForce 210 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
1%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 0.5 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 4.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 39.36 GFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
