Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6600 XT is 4309 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of GeForce 210
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Radeon RX 6600 XT - £4.00 vs £8.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT - 31 vs 160 Watts
Advantages of Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Performs up to 710% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce 210 - 81 vs 10 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 30th, 2021
FPS
81
100%
Value, £/FPS
£8.47/FPS
47%
Price, £
£685.78
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for £685.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 30th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 30th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 210 | vs | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 30th, 2021 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Navi II |
Not Available | MSRP | $379 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1968 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2589 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |