The Arc A750 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and it's also a much better value for money, as it's £418.13 cheaper!
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 68% cheaper – £199.99 vs £618.12
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 120 vs 225 Watts
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, £
£199.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.63/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
68%
Min 1% FPS
44
62%
Price, £
£618.12
32%
Value, £/FPS
£7.44/FPS
22%
Buy on Amazon
£618.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£712.65
In Stock
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
56%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
32%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
32%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A750 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| $289.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
268.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
537.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
17.2 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
