Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon RX 6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon RX 6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1062 days older than the cheaper Radeon RX 6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Up to 68% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - £128.27 vs £395.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - £1.14 vs £2.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 53 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 20% better in Sea of Thieves than Radeon RX 6400 - 136 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon RX 6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
113
83%
Value, £/FPS
£1.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £128.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.91/FPS
39%
Price, £
£395.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for £395.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
65%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Navi II | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$159 | MSRP | $279 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
128 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1923 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2321 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |