Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 130 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 2300% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 24 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - £16.0 vs £127.97 per FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 67% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - £127.97 vs £383.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 65 vs 120 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
24
100%
Value, £/FPS
£16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£383.99
33%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Buy for £127.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
24%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
24%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |