Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3025 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R7 250 - 66 vs 57 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 50 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £227 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
19.841801850113956%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
26.452189454870418%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |