Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1983 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 35% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Radeon R7 250 - 191 vs 141 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65459 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
17.273576097105508%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
18.841502227880333%
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $219 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |