Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Logo
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS XS OC Gaming Graphics Card - 6GB GDDR6, 1815MHz, PCI Express x16 3.0, 192-bit, 3x DP, HDMI 2.0b

Buy for £219 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Logo
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS XS OC Gaming Graphics Card - 6GB GDDR6, 1815MHz, PCI Express x16 3.0, 192-bit, 3x DP, HDMI 2.0b

Buy for £219 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 2188 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

  • Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 50 vs 125 Watts

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

  • Performs up to 83% better in Deathloop than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 75 vs 41 FPS
  • Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 6 vs 2 GB
This is a free version of Deathloop.
Deathloop

Deathloop

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM Logo
Radeon R5 240 OEM

Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013


FPS

41

54.666666666666664%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019


FPS

75

100%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

£219

100%

FPS Winner

MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS XS OC Gaming Graphics Card - 6GB GDDR6, 1815MHz, PCI Express x16 3.0, 192-bit, 3x DP, HDMI 2.0b

Buy for £219 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM Logo
Radeon R5 240 OEM

Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM Logo
Radeon R5 240 OEM

Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013


Pixel Fillrate

6.24 GPixel/s

7.282913165266105%

Texel Fillrate

18.72 GTexel/s

11.915977084659453%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

85.68 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

157.1 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Nov 1st, 2013Release Date
Oct 29th, 2019
Volcanic IslandsGenerationGeForce 16
Not AvailableMSRP$229
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
NonePower Connectors1x 8-pin
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2 GBMemory
6 GB
DDR3TypeGDDR6
64-bitBus192-bit
14.4 GB/sBandwidth
336 GB/s
730 MHzBase Clock Speed
1530 MHz
780 MHzBoost Clock Speed
1785 MHz
900 MHzMemory Clock Speed
1750 MHz

Builds Using Radeon R5 240 OEM or GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Deathloop, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.