Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1959 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 42% better in Dirt 5 than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 119 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 6 vs 2 GB
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
7.282913165266105%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
11.915977084659453%
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $219 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |