Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 143 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - 65 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Performs up to 100% better in Remnant II than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 26 vs 13 FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
17.31 GPixel/s
31%
Texel Fillrate
34.62 GTexel/s
25%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
| Radeon Pro Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
| 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
| 1082 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1725 MHz |
| 1000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
