Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 1563 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 12% better in War Thunder than GeForce GTX 1650 - 248 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 75 vs 130 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
222
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.68/FPS
100%
Price, £
£149.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
34%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
29%
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$599 | MSRP | $149 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2440 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |