Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 55% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 488 vs 314 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€765.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7422 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
90 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |