Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-2430 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3887 days newer than Xeon E5-2430.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2430 - 193 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 16 vs 12 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€810.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2430 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |