Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 394 vs 324 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
394
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €243.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |