In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-12700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v2
No clear advantages
Core i7-12700K
- Up to 84% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 84% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-12700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-12700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-12700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
10 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i7-12700K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
