Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3097 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 264 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
264
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€106.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €106.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |