Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E-2336 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 483 days newer than Xeon E-2336.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 6% better in War Thunder than Xeon E-2336 - 237 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2336 - 16 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€810.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2336 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |