Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 904 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 289 vs 266 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $765.76 vs $1220.72
- Up to 42% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $2.65 vs $4.59 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
266
92%
Value, €/FPS
€4.59/FPS
58%
Price, €
€1220.72
62%
Buy for €1,220.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6955 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€765.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6954 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |