Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 764 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $182.69 vs $280.01
- Up to 25% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.86 vs $1.15 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 270 vs 237 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
237
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €202.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Buy for €310.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Colfax | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |