Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $182.69 vs $219.21
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 72% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 305 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 30% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.80 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
177
58%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
70%
Price, €
€202.79
100%
Buy for €202.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
305
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.32
83%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €243.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |