Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 15 days older than Ryzen 9 6900HX.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 9 6900HX - 189 vs 186 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 6900HX | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rembrandt | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |