Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 61 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $99.65 vs $129.56
- Up to 22% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-12600KF - $0.61 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-12400F - 166 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
164
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6548 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
78%
Price, €
€129.56
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €129.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6548 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |