The Ryzen 7 2700 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $74.76 cheaper!
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 32% cheaper – $158.56 vs $233.32
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 16 threads
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-10900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
180
94%
Min 1% FPS
120
94%
Price, €
€158.56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€233.32
67%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
73%
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-10900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 2700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$299.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |