Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 189 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - 193 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $234.56 vs $271.88
- Up to 19% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - $1.35 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €301.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€260.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €260.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |