Buy on Amazon
€518.82
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP $249
Availability
MSRP $249
AvailabilityMSRP $599
Availability
MSRP $599
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3600XT on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 851 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3600XT.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 8% better in DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 5 3600XT - 542 vs 501 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $230.09 vs $467.41
- Up to 55% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $0.47 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-core, 12-threads unlocked desktop processor with Wraith Spire cooler
Buy for €518.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-12900K Gaming Desktop Processor with Integrated Graphics and 16 (8P+8E) Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
