Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 426 days older than the more expensive Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $251.35 vs $765.76
- Up to 67% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-13400F - $1.05 vs $3.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6345 minutes ago
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6344 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |