The Ryzen 5 2600 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900F, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $301.80 cheaper!
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 71% cheaper – $126.13 vs $427.93
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 12 threads
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i9-13900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
181
84%
Min 1% FPS
120
85%
Price, €
€126.13
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
216
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, €
€427.93
29%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
35%
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i9-13900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 2600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |