Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1361 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $109.57 vs $219.10
- Up to 28% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-12900KF - $2.29 vs $3.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 45% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2400G - 77 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
53
69%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Buy for €243.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |