Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2073 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $109.57 vs $338.78
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.78 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 193 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
155
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
40%
Price, €
€376.05
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |