Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1271 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3300X
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $127.02 vs $390.09
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-14900K - $0.51 vs $1.31 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 3300X - 298 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
248
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €127.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7255 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
39%
Price, €
€390.09
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7254 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |