Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 559 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3300X
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $127.02 vs $251.35
- Up to 45% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-12900K - $1.02 vs $1.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 3 3300X - 135 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
124
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €127.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7268 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.86/FPS
55%
Price, €
€251.35
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7267 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |